| About us | Activities | Partners | Services |
 |
| Main |
| About us |
| Activities |
| Partners |
| Services |
| Map |
| Activities |
| On-going Projects |
| Implemented Projects |
| Labour Market Activity |
| On-going Projects |
| Spreading the democratic culture |
| Spreading the democratic culture |
| Trainings schedule |
| Results of trainings and participant’s thanks letters |
| Search |
RESULTS OF TRAININGS
Throughout the project period the evaluation of trainings have been conducted in the Western, Northern, Central, Southern and Eastern regions of Ukraine. Evaluation was conducted in few months after trainings.
During the survey it has become possible to get the answers on the questionnaire from the following amount of trainings’ participants (according to the regions):
|
Region
|
Survey term
|
Total trainings’ participants
|
Polled
|
% polled
|
|
Western
|
14-21.11.2008
|
119
|
63
|
52,94%
|
|
Southern
|
06-10.04.2009
|
138
|
56
|
40,58%
|
|
Central
|
10-17.07.2009
|
160
|
102
|
63,75%
|
|
Southern
|
07-11.12.2009
|
168
|
87
|
51,8%
|
|
Eastern
|
21-25.12.2009
|
166
|
79
|
47,6%
|
Method of questionnaire:Questionnairing per e-mail – 30 %, telephone questionnaire – 70 %.
Monitoring questionnaire contained the following questions:
On training “Parliamentary Procedures”:
1. Have you spread the knowledge aquired during the training:
- amoung your personnel;
- amoung deputies of the council, or party fellows.
2. Have you used on practice the knowledge aquired during the training:
- re-read the regulations of the council;
- have made suggestions regarding changes to the regulations;
- have made other suggestions in the context of disscussed on the seminars issues.
On training “Public Relations”:
1. Have you spread the knowledge aquired during the training:
- amoung your personnel;
- amoung deputies of the council, or party fellows.
2. Have you used on practice the knowledge aquired during the training:
- in professional activity, deputative work;
- to correct own image.
The outputs of nameless questionnaire of the trainings’ participants show the quality of trainers’ work, level of organization and communicative opportunities during the trainings. Participants estimated the following criteria (on 5-points scale from 1-«awful» to 5-«excellent»)*:
*Note. The diagram is made according to the chart 3 outputs
One of the most important indicators, which prove the significance of this project to target audience, is the level of knowledge, which participants gained during the trainings comparing to the level they had before. Analysis of nameless questionnaire on course estimation allowed getting the following indicator. Participants estimated that during the trainings they gained on the average 63% from total percent of knowledge (100%) on suggested topic. In such case on the topic «Parliamentary procedures» participants gained 61% of knowledge, and on the topic «Public relations» - 65% of knowledge.
The project’s team estimates such indicators as excellent.
The same resolutions one can make after analysis of survey evaluation outputs (questionnaire, conducted in few months after the trainings were done):
In particular, during the process of evaluation the questions about how could the participants spread and/or use gained during the trainings knowledge were put to the participants. The answers are the following:
The vast majority (over 80%) participants of trainings indicated, that they spread he knowledge among the deputies of their council and within the political party.
The quite big (over 60%) is the level of practical knowledge usage, gained during the training «Parliamentary procedures».
The same big (round 80%) is the level of practical knowledge usage, gained during the training «Public relations».
PARTICIPANTS’ REVIEWS
PARTICIPANTS’ REVIEWS JUST RIGHT AFTER TRAININGS WERE DONE
· Seminar-training didn’t break my willingness to keep on working in interactive mode – as teaching others, so to study (and this is very important!).
Yes, it’s truth, trainer neither opened new land for us – it is already open, nor created the wheel – which is used among the people for many thousand years now. He (Mr. Kashevskyi) just collected “stone to stone” personal, domestic and world experience, changed and adapted to practice, for needs of time, elements of games, as if puzzle or designer.
I am sure, that such trainings will help to a lot of people and deputies to become more open, democratic, and loyal to colleagues, work in general, but first of all to themselves. And this is very important, because we know, we cannot change the world-we only can change ourselves and our attitude to this world. To my mind it’s huge step forward.
So, the only thing left for us, training participants is learn how to be open, to study, to work and implement.
Natalia Podranetska,Rivne, 12.04.2008
· Triumph of good sense.
Myroslav Kuza, Kremenets, Ternopil region, 29.06.2008
· I am so appreciate for the knowledge I got on this seminar-training (Parliamentary procedures), which would play a very important role in my subsequent work.
Maryana Gydzovska, Tysmenytsya, Ivano-Frankivsk, 29.06.2008
PARTICIPANTS’ REVIEWS IN 6 MONTHS AFTER TRAININGS
(FROM THE EVALUATION SURVEYS)
· More trainings like this. Hope for close cooperation and in the future!!!
· Appreciate to Volyn Resource Centre for well organized trainings. It would be nice to have more such meetings, because there are still way too many questions in the work of bodies of local self-governance!!!
· Liked a lot! We participated in trainings organized by the INSTITUTE OF POLITICAL EDUCATION and certainly can say that trainings organized by Volyn Resource Centre are more interesting and useful, because they give an opportunity to turn theory into practice.
· There is a willingness to apply all gained knowledge in practice.
· Invite more
· Thank you for interesting training "Parliamentary procedures "! I regret that having personal problems couldn’t participate in the second training!
· Consider this project as something really useful for young deputies in local councils, because working as a deputy you sometimes face with problems of theoretical knowledge insufficiency and lack of practical experience. Thank you organizers for trainings.
· Thanks!!! Gained knowledge is extremely useful, as almost every day I use them in my work. Thanks again!!!
ESTIMATION OF TRAININGS BY PARTICIPANTS
In the end of each course, participants were filling in the nameless questionnaire to estimate the course. The following criteria were used to estimate the course:
1. The general level of training course usefulness
2. Methodology
3. Intelligibility of suggested material
4. Opportunity in experience exchange
5. Atmosphere, communication between the participants and trainers
6. Handouts quality
7. Trainers’ skills (knowledge on the course)
8. Trainings’ intensity
9. Level of training’s organization (training room, nourishment, hotel)
The estimation was conducted at 5 points scale (from 1-«awful» to 5-«excellent»). The outputs after estimation are the following:
|
¹
|
topic
|
city
|
sequence number of estimation’s criterion
|
mean
value
|
||||||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
||||
|
1
|
PP
|
Rivne
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
5
|
4,78
|
|
2
|
PR
|
Rivne
|
4,5
|
4,6
|
4,6
|
4,6
|
4,4
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,64
|
|
3
|
PP
|
Turka
|
4,2
|
4,4
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
5
|
4
|
4,6
|
4,2
|
3,6
|
4,42
|
|
4
|
PP
|
Ternopil
|
4,5
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
4,6
|
4,6
|
4,6
|
4,6
|
4,4
|
4,4
|
4,60
|
|
5
|
PR
|
Lviv
|
4,4
|
4,6
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
4,72
|
|
6
|
PR
|
Ternopil
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
5
|
4,7
|
4,6
|
4,79
|
|
7
|
PP
|
Chernihiv
|
4,4
|
4,6
|
4,4
|
4,4
|
4,9
|
4,4
|
4,8
|
4,5
|
3,7
|
4,46
|
|
8
|
PR
|
Korostyshiv
|
4,7
|
5
|
5
|
4,2
|
4,9
|
4,6
|
5
|
4,6
|
4,5
|
4,72
|
|
9
|
PP
|
Korostyshiv
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,8
|
4,9
|
4,6
|
4,5
|
4,76
|
|
10
|
PR
|
Korostyshiv
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,7
|
4,2
|
4,77
|
|
11
|
PR
|
Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
4,6
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
4,74
|
|
12
|
PP
|
Korostyshiv
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
4,79
|
|
13
|
PR
|
Poltava
|
4,75
|
4,6
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,75
|
4,5
|
4,78
|
|
14
|
PP
|
Poltava
|
3,3
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
4,5
|
4,75
|
4,6
|
4,93
|
4,5
|
4,5
|
4,53
|
|
15
|
PP
|
Vinnytsya
|
4,1
|
4,5
|
4,6
|
4,1
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,6
|
4,7
|
4,56
|
|
16
|
PR
|
Vinnytsya
|
4,6
|
4,8
|
4,9
|
4,1
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
4,9
|
4,7
|
4,1
|
4,64
|
|
17
|
PR
|
Cherkasy
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
4,5
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
4,5
|
4,8
|
4,5
|
4,7
|
4,67
|
|
18
|
PP
|
Cherkasy
|
4,8
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,5
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
5
|
4,9
|
4,7
|
4,83
|
|
19
|
PP
|
Zaporizhya
|
4,4
|
4,6
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,9
|
4,4
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,68
|
|
20
|
PR
|
Zaporizhya
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
5
|
4,9
|
5
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,90
|
|
21
|
PP
|
Evpatoriya
|
4,1
|
5
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,6
|
4,6
|
5
|
4,6
|
4,5
|
4,66
|
|
22
|
PR
|
Evpatoriya
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,7
|
4,6
|
5
|
4,8
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,79
|
|
23
|
PP
|
Koblevo
|
4,4
|
4,5
|
4,8
|
4,6
|
4,9
|
4,6
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,69
|
|
24
|
PR
|
Koblevo
|
4,4
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,6
|
4,9
|
4,70
|
|
25
|
PP
|
Koblevo
|
4,1
|
5
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,6
|
4,6
|
5
|
4,6
|
4,5
|
4,66
|
|
26
|
PR
|
Koblevo
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,7
|
4,6
|
5
|
4,8
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
4,5
|
4,77
|
|
27
|
PP
|
Dnipropetrovsk
|
4,6
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,6
|
4,9
|
4,81
|
|
28
|
PR
|
Dnipropetrovsk
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
4,97
|
|
29
|
PP
|
Kharkiv
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
4,84
|
|
30
|
PR
|
Kharkiv
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,7
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,6
|
4,83
|
|
31
|
PP
|
Donetsk
|
4,5
|
4,9
|
4,8
|
4,7
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
5
|
4,8
|
4,82
|
|
32
|
PR
|
Donetsk
|
4,6
|
4,9
|
5
|
4,8
|
4,8
|
5
|
4,7
|
5
|
4,7
|
4,83
|
|
33
|
PP
|
Lugansk
|
4,6
|
4,7
|
4,6
|
4,8
|
4,6
|
4,6
|
4,9
|
4,6
|
4,9
|
4,70
|
|
34
|
PR
|
Lugansk
|
4,8
|
5
|
5
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
4,9
|
5
|
4,9
|
4,92
|
|
Mean value
|
4,66
|
4,86
|
4,84
|
4,84
|
4,84
|
4,85
|
4,87
|
4,85
|
4,79
|
|
||
Updated: 19.03.2010 17:36
| None 17 | |
| |
|
| None 18 | |